‘Poltergeist III’ (1988): Second sequel not scary enough, but visually better than its predecessor

Frankly at this point, we’d welcome poltergeists at the Movies & Drinks/Drunk TV World Headquarters.

By Paul Mavis

Sadly, like so many other large conglomerates in major urban areas nowadays, we’re regretfully pulling up stakes from our corporate digs. Unlike the others, though, it’s not the violent zombie drug addicts or the psychotic homeless crapping on our stoop that are chasing us out (they’re actually our two largest reader demos). It’s the terminally bored killjoy millennial swine we keep seeing in the building and down on the street, stroking their beards as they snicker into their $20 lattes, muttering about “level playing fields” and Trump and gasoline engines as they bitch about their 5-hour work days, “unfairness,” and having to share the planet with people over 30. There’s only so much we can take.

Give me a demonic ghost bent on killing me any day. A few years back, Shout! Factory’s Scream Factory released on Blu-ray Poltergeist III, a collector’s edition of the 1988 sequel to 1986’s Poltergeist II: The Other Side (which we reviewed here). Co-written and directed by pro Gary Sherman, co-scripted by Brian Taggert, and starring Poltergeist series regulars Heather O’Rourke and Zelda Rubinstein, along with Tom Skerritt, Nancy Allen, Lara Flynn Boyle, Richard Fire, Nathan Davis, and Kipley Wentz, Poltergeist III certainly proved the old law of diminishing returns for franchise sequels.

Click to order Poltergeist III on Blu-ray:

(Paid link. As an Amazon Associate, the website owner earns from qualifying purchases.)

Even with a severely truncated budget it didn’t show a profit on its slim box office returns (which weren’t exactly helped, either, by the depressing real-life death of O’Rourke four months prior to the movie’s release). However, just from a visual standpoint—please excuse me for just a moment, readers: “Carol Anne! Carol Anne! Where are you?!” Sorry—Poltergeist III is actually an improvement over the first sequel, with a nicely chilly atmosphere and some sweet live, in-camera special effects and trickery making up for the regrettably soft PG-13 scares.

Chicago, in the massive, 100-story John Hancock Center skyscraper. Building manager Bruce Gardner (Tom Skerritt), his art gallery owner wife, Pat (Nancy Allen), and Bruce’s teen daughter from a previous marriage, Donna (Lara Flynn Boyle), have taken in little Carol Anne Freeling (Heather O’Rourke) for a few months. Pat is Carol Anne’s aunt, and the Freelings (not shown in the movie) have sent Carol Anne to Chicago so she can attend a special school for children with “emotional problems.”

Carol Anne’s therapist, Dr. Seaton (Richard Fire), thinks Carol Anne is a straight-up manipulator who can induce mass hypnosis in people, but we know Carol Anne is still being sought by “other side” boogeyman Reverend Kane (Nathan Davis), who needs Carol Anne’s purity and innocence to cross over into the “light.” Thanks to douchey Dr. Seaton, the constant harping on Carol Anne’s nightmares has sent a spiritual beacon out to Kane, who descends upon the skyscraper, intent on capturing her through devilish trickery, including animating everyone’s reflections in the building’s mirrors…and, um…turning up the AC. Will emotionally chilly Pat finally declare her love for Carol Anne…Carol Anne…Carol Anne!, before Tangina (Zelda Rubinstein) arrives to save Carol Anne…Carol Anne…Carol Anne!?

Considering all the negative waves that seemed to be aimed at Poltergeist III, what’s surprising is that it managed to scrape up anything close to its final, meager $14 million and change box office haul. By 1988, the Poltergeist franchise, such as it was with only two movies released in eight years, was played out. The series’ only indispensable star, 12-year-old Heather O’Rourke, was getting older (she looked too big for that red romper), with the narrative window for a sympathetic audience being frightened for this “child,” already closing fast.

Co-scripter Brian Taggert (solid genre work like Of Unknown Origin and Visiting Hours admits (in one of this disc’s extras) that eliminating the Freeling family connection from Poltergeist III was a big, big mistake. A (literally) distant aunt for Carol Anne just didn’t cut it for the franchise’s central premise of the tight-knit Freelings constantly re-discovering that family love conquerors evil.

Director Gary Sherman admits in this disc’s commentary track that he didn’t really want to do Poltergeist IIInever a good thing, no matter how much of a pro the helmer is, as in this case—but that he did it out of obligation to the MGM studio heads he “owed.” And once he was on-board, he was severely limited in what he could film in terms of violence, due to a mandatory “no R” rating from MGM (why in the world would you take the guy who made the transcendentally violent exploitation masterpiece Vice Squad, and tell him to make a family-friendly horror movie?).

RELATED | More horror movie reviews

A lack of chemistry between the two second-tier (or even third-tier) leads did nothing to bring in patrons (“Let’s see the new Tom Skerrit movie!”…said no one ever), and of course, the death of O’Rourke put a pall over the whole movie, a pall made worse by MGM, in a misguided attempt to be “sensitive” and “non-exploitive,” basically dumping the movie by barring any extensive promotion by the cast, and by refusing to ballyhoo the real-life tragedy associated with it. If that sounds insensitive, it is…but it’s nothing compared to what the barracudas in Hollywood really think and feel (if someone at MGM, which needed a hit in 1988 like you and I need air to breathe, had had the tactless, amoral balls to smell opportunity and really play up what happened, you could have added another $20 million to that b.o. total).

Too bad, that, too…because Poltergeist III beats out the better-attended Poltergeist II: The Other Side, at least in terms of a cohesive, well-meshed visual and special effects strategy. Whereas the first sequel fell apart with its hodge-podge, boring visuals and diffused special effects, Poltergeist III has a unified, consistent vision that’s quite nice. You can argue whether or not a sterile glass, steel and stone skyscraper is the proper setting for a Poltergeist movie (Taggert claims it wasn’t, but Sherman, who grew up in one, specifically chose the setting).

However, in terms of getting that world on screen, Sherman pulls it off. Icy blues, greens, blacks and ghostly whites fill the screen, and chilly, impersonal, unwelcoming surfaces like metal and glass mirror dominate. With composer Joe Renzetti’s crappy synth score (they couldn’t afford Goldsmith this time around) playing over these modern, frosty, claustrophobic interiors, Poltergeist III initially feels like some kind of sweet Italian giallo, all surface menace amid the depersonalized surroundings.

Adding to the fun—at least for movie buffs—are all of Sherman’s intricately designed in-camera tricks. According to everyone, no opticals were used; all effects were achieved through mirrors, doubles, and practical mechanical effects. And initially, it’s quite fun to see how they mix. The opening shot—for people who notice these kinds of things—shows how cool the shots can be on Sherman’s doubled sets, when the camera p.o.v. pulls right through what should be Kane looking in on Carol Anne (because we can see him in the opposite reflection). Sherman also has a lot of fun cutting back and forth between characters trying to distinguish between what they see in their reality, and what’s different in their mirrored reflection, making for some amusing, zippy scenes.

RELATED | More 1980s film reviews

Unfortunately, my qualifications above—”for movie buffs who notice these things”—are all too true for the average Poltergeist III viewer, then, in 1988, and now. My teenager watched this with me, and she had no idea there was anything special about those shots until I explained them. And once she understood the process, she basically said, “So what—why isn’t it scarier?”

Exactly. PG-13 Poltergeist III may look like some weirdo stylized/cheapo giallo, but it delivers few if any genuine shocks (and certainly none of the disgusting, splattery carnage normally associated with that genre). As for the effects, they’re intricately choreographed, certainly, but their cleverness is ultimately for naught because the scares within those tricks just aren’t there (one gets the feeling that reluctant-to-begin-with Sherman decided to deal with this unwanted project by hunkering down with his Erector set visuals, and screw the rest of it).

Some set pieces that should jolt the viewer are only just okay (when Boyle starts coming out of that Rubenstein mummy, you’re going with it…until you notice how clean and un-slimy she appears breaking through what looks to be a rather large blackberry crumble pie), while others are cheated because of the budget (you set up Rich as the movie’s slimy villain…and then cut away when he’s pushed down an elevator shaft? Seriously?). Thank god those boring teens are around for their interminable G-rated Porky’s hijinks—in-between 121 exclamations of “Carol Anne!” from the various characters—as well as the hilarity of the other dialogue (when a visibly fed-up Allen screams, “Who the hell goddamn cares!” when Carol Anne almost drowned, I hit the floor dying).

By the time the jerry-rigged finale comes around (re-shot when the first one crapped out), Poltergeist III isn’t even about its star O’Rourke anymore (a double hides her face in shame)—it’s about whether or not frigid bitch Allen will admit…that she can’t always express her feelings very well (to hell with Tangina—call Dr. Phil!). As for Kane, he’s almost an afterthought, too, when his poor widdle noggin is popped off like a dandelion head (that is the cheapest, most hysterically phony mechanical head I’ve ever seen).

For all you Poltergeist fans who are convinced that the alternate, original ending—included on this disc—would magically fix Poltergeist III‘s many problems, well…forget it. Amid the laughable frozen dummies of the main characters, and the supposedly malevolent Kane illogically reduced to the spiritual equivalent of Charlie Brown’s Christmas tree as he’s led into “the light,” (he just needed a little love, I guess…), we see that nothing could have saved this misguided effort. Not even that last shot of a seemingly relieved Heather O’Rourke.

A quick word about Shout!’s extras here (because we’re obsessive stalkers who will not be ignored when it comes to getting some free product. We know where you live….). First up is a commentary track from director Gary Sherman, moderated by Michael Felsher…who gets the best laugh on the entire disc when he tells Sherman that he’s making noise on the track with his microphone (Sherman gives a small, compliant, “Sorry”—kinda sad). Lots of interesting detail from Sherman on how he achieved his special effects tricks (pretty cool and involved), along with some honest appraisal of why the movie doesn’t work (summed up neatly by Sherman’s blunt, “I don’t think this movie is scary enough,”).

Next, a commentary track with blogger David Furtney is included. I liked his pointed, detailed discussion of Poltergeist II: The Other Side, but here…he’s pretty quiet. Good info, though, particularly in relationship to what happened in post-production. Next, a few new documentaries. High Spirits: An Interview With Screenwriter Brian Taggert (16:00), features a first in my experience: a Hollywood artist who actually takes responsibility for a failed movie! Remarkable (Taggert says he shouldn’t have taken out the Freelings from the story, and he should have pushed not to have the story set in a skyscraper). Interesting asides from the veteran writer.

Next, Reflections: An Interview With Actress Nancy Allen (12:15), features that exploitation dream queen (still looking great) discussing the movie’s production. Another straight shooter, Allen admits she fought with Skerritt (unfortunately, she offers no further details…but you can see on screen they weren’t happy together), to the point where she eventually she just wanted the movie to be over (“Can we just shoot this movie?”), and that O’Rourke’s funeral was awful (“Open coffin is bad enough…but you put a child in it”).

Next, Mirror Images: An Interview With Special Effects Creator John Caglione, Jr. (12:47), has Poltergeist III‘s special effects creator Caglione discussing his role as facilitator of all of the movie’s Dick Smith designs. He’s complimentary of this tough, but well organized, shoot (and his funny story of bringing in a stripper for a production meeting is a classic). Next, the infamous alternate ending (2:38) is included—a bit of a misnomer because it was Poltergeist III‘s original ending, before it was ditched and re-shot. No sound, just subtitles (taken from the script), and poor printing end up sabotaging what looks to be already unpromising material. An original (and ineffective) trailer (1:04), four TV spots (each around :30), a still gallery, and the script round out this impressive, entertaining set of extras.

PAUL MAVIS IS AN INTERNATIONALLY PUBLISHED MOVIE AND TELEVISION HISTORIAN, A MEMBER OF THE ONLINE FILM CRITICS SOCIETY, AND THE AUTHOR OF THE ESPIONAGE FILMOGRAPHY. Click to order.

Read more of Paul’s movie reviews here. Read Paul’s TV reviews at our sister website, Drunk TV.

4 thoughts on “‘Poltergeist III’ (1988): Second sequel not scary enough, but visually better than its predecessor

  1. You described the Climate Change creeps to a T but, while there are places to, the contagion is far worse than Covid or the goddam vaccination. Rome and Athens still exist but hey do not rule the world. I liked when America did, or England, which was destroyed from within by an undocumented alliance between lady Diana and Tony Blair.

    Like

      1. I disagree with a lot of the review but I will say something not mentioned enough is that the popularity of Heather O’Rourke’s character Carol Anne in the original movie lead to the sequels increasing their focus on her, worshipping her more and more with each of the sequels. That goes some way to explaining the constant repetition of Carol Anne in the third movie.

        Like

Leave a comment